Posts Tagged ‘Super Bowl’

What Is Your Attention Worth?

by on Wednesday, September 22nd, 2010

Permission marketing requires marketers to obtain the consumer’s consent before delivering a marketing message (one that is relevant and timely, of course). It is the opposite of traditional interruption marketing, which is delivered whether whether the consumer likes it or not. Permission marketing was an answer to an increasingly cluttered messaging environment in which marketers competed with each other to communicate with consumers.

(via Zoutedrop - Creative Commons)

A new way of looking at the question of who gets to reach the consumer focuses on a different dimension: not clutter, but time. Marketers are competing with consumers for the right to communicate. Consumers can, as Joe Marchese of Social Vibe puts it, “‘outbid’ marketers for their own attention.” In other words, if their time is worth more than marketers are willing to pay for their attention, consumers may be willing to pay not not to be interrupted by marketing messages.

So, what is a consumer’s attention worth? Most consumers behave as if their time and attention in short supply – something that increases with income. This makes attention an increasingly scarce, and therefore pricey, commodity. A marketer’s ability to communicate a message to a consumer comes down to what that consumer thinks their time is worth. In one of his posts, Marchese uses the example of a marketer who effectively values attention to a 30-second pre-roll (the ads before a web site opens) at one cent per impression. Marchese suggests that since almost everyone values their time at more than $1.20/hour, most would pay the penny rather than sit through the ad.

We can see this with smartphone apps, which often are released in both “lite” and “full” versions. The lite version has most of the web application’s features, carries ads and is free. The full version contains the full feature set but no ads and is not free. It would be interesting to know how much of the purchase price consumers who buy the full version are mentally allocating to the added features and how much to the freedom from ads. Still, marketers are drawn to this business model because downloads of the “lite” versions are said to drive sales of the paid app.

Smaller marketers aren’t competing for consumers’ attention with TV spots and web site pre-roll. Frequently, they are using inherently cluttered media such as newspapers and directories. But regardless of the marketing channels they use, small marketers need to understand how difficult it is to capture and sustain consumers’ attention. With limited time, consumers’ will pick and choose from the messages that are out there, or may simply decide that it’s worth some money to enjoy content free of any messages.

How can smaller marketers compete for consumers’ attention? If there is a market for consumer attention, presumably the price fluctuates. Smaller marketers need to be nimble enough to take advantage of these price changes and bid for consumer attention only when the price goes down. When does that happen? Perhaps when the message can be linked with something with which the consumer has a positive association. The most obvious example is the Super Bowl, in which the interruption of the game is not only accepted but welcomed. When else might the price go down? Perhaps when the consumer is engaged in an activity that makes them feel good, or feel good about themselves. Smaller marketers that associate themselves with a charitable cause may be able to communicate marketing messages as part of the communications that relate to the cause. And perhaps when the “marketer” is actually a fellow consumer. This is one of the insights underling social shopping: that consumers will more readily accept, trust and act on messages from peers than from marketers.

The Zavee takeaway:

  • Time is the commodity in short supply, so the competition for consumer attention is less with other marketers than with the consumer.
  • Consumers may outbid you for their own attention, even if they have to pay to make you go away.
  • The price of consumer attention constantly changes. Figure out when the price goes down and be nimble enough to seize the opportunity.

The Other Super Bowl

by on Tuesday, February 9th, 2010

How did you like the big game? No, not the one with the Saints and Colts – the one with the Snickers and Doritos. The phenomenon probably began during the first dot com boom of the late 90s, but in recent years the commercials that air during the Super Bowl have attracted almost as much attention as the game itself.

Drew Brees, Jan 7, 2010

It’s fun for those of us whose marketing budgets don’t include the $2-3 million it takes to buy a spot or even the mid-six figures it costs for production.  It’s like going to the marina to gawk at the hundred foot yachts.  Still, there are some things small business people can learn from the big game.

One thing is the value of leverage, getting extra value out of your marketing dollars.  Long before the game is played and the commercials run, there are stories in the media about different marketers’ strategies and even teaser clips of upcoming spots. Using public relations to generate interest ahead of the air date makes sense because it’s a low-cost, effective strategy for increasing awareness and impact.  This year the story lines included Pepsi’s decision not to advertise on the Super Bowl, Budweiser’s decision not to feature its iconic Clydesdale horses (a decision that was ultimately reversed) and CBS’s decision to air a “pro-family” spot featuring Florida QB Tim Tebow.

According to most commentators, this wasn’t a vintage year for Super Bowl ads. “There were no standouts,” according this post on AdRants that summarized industry and consumer reactions to the ads. Seth Stephenson of Slate agreed. Bob Garfield of Advertising Age liked Audi’s “Green Police” ad, the “men’s liberation” themed spots from Dodge and FloTV, and not much else. Barbara Lippert of AdWeek and Slate’s Stephenson liked Google’s simple, effective execution that combined narrative with product demonstration – and cost next to nothing to produce. But just about everyone seemed to like the Snickers spot in which young athletes played like Betty White and Abe Vigoda until they ate a Snickers bar.

As always, advertising insiders took their shots at USA Today’s Ad Meter, which records the real time reactions of a panel of consumers to each of the spots as they run during the game. The Ad Meter can drive professionals nuts – especially since 2007, when CareerBuilder fired its agency after a poor Ad Meter showing. The Ad Meter doesn’t measure strategic insight or clarity of message – it’s the People’s Choice Awards of advertising, and it was won this year by the Snickers ad.  Lippert observed that “[t]he spots that do well on the Ad Meter are the ones that feature the kind of tricks viewers have been trained to expect, like man-on-man violence and/or cute animals. It’s like teaching to the test.”  Garfield called the consumers on the panel “AdMeter-ocrities.”

Another takeaway of interest to small business is the increasing impact of Social Media on conventional media.  While insiders might not like it, Social Media makes consumer reaction to advertising easier to track, and agencies are starting to see the value in doing so. In addition to the Ad Meter and Ad Bowl (another panel-based ranking), Social Media provided a way to gain insight into consumer reactions to the ads. Ad agency Mullen and Social Media monitoring firm Radian6 tracked Twitter feeds to determine the top brands coming out of the Super Bowl (Doritos, Google and Focus on the Family took the top three spots). Several other firms had similar strategies.

As for me, my Super Bowl Sunday was made by Google, Snickers and E-Trade (I know, but imagine another category that has room for both trash-talking babies and Sam Waterston).  And the Saints. Definitely the Saints.

The Zavee takeaway:

  • Make your marketing part of your company’s story – it will make your marketing budget do more and go farther.
  • You can do it inexpensively – conventional PR is one way, Social Media is another.
  • The most distinctive and creative way to tell your story doesn’t have to be the most expensive.