Archive for the ‘News’ Category

Making Social Media Easier

by on Monday, January 23rd, 2012

When we talk with local businesses about Social Media, the most frequent objection to becoming more socially engaged is time. Many local merchants believe that the time required to attend to Facebook and Twitter is better used for tasks more directly related to running the business. Rather than argue the importance of Social Media, we’d like to pass along a post on Mashable that introduces some tools that make it easier than ever for a small business to manage its Social Media presence and derive maximum value from this powerful marketing medium.

via Kevin Moore (Creative Commons)

Some of these tools are geared toward agencies or at least larger companies, but there are two that we have used successfully at Zavee: HootSuite and TweetDeck. Both applications live on the desktop although both have mobile versions. TweetDeck is free and HootSuite has a free version that should be fine for most businesses. Both apps let the user manage multiple streams (e.g., Facebook and Twitter) simultaneously, including posting the same content to several streams. Both apps make it easy to schedule posts, so an hour or two on the weekend can result in a week’s worth of posts.

It’s also easy to redirect content, so a link, image or other content that is found on Twitter can be shared out on Facebook (and vice versa). This can be especially valuable for Zavee merchants, because Zavee shoppers now can share merchant-related content on Social Media even more easily than before. So merchants that sees a good review or recommendation can increase its reach by putting that content in their own Social Media stream. Merchants also can push news announcements published on Zavee to their Facebook and Twitter streams. That gets their own content noticed by even more potential customers.

Social Media can’t be fully automated, any more than any other marketing tool. But these two apps (and others mentioned in the Mashable post) can make the time devoted to Social Media time well spent.

Can Social Media Build Loyalty?

by on Tuesday, November 22nd, 2011

Pitney Bowes recently released the results of a large-scale, multi-country online survey (PDF) about which specific engagement techniques encourage consumers to “continue using a business and maybe buy more from them.” The key finding of the study, as reported in MediaPost and elsewhere, is that social media has little effectiveness as a channel for building loyalty: “Only 18% of consumers believe that the ability to interact with a large company on social platforms would encourage them to buy from that company. This average drops to 15% for small companies.”

Consumers were more likely to be loyal to brands that gave them more control over the shopping experience: “Being able to choose home delivery; choosing how to interact with a company (which communication channel); controlling the frequency of those interactions; and having a say in the company’s development of products and services.”

Social Sharing (via Elmo H. Love, Creative Commons)

So, does that mean that social media is a waste of effort for brands that want engage with consumers? Not at all. Although the underlying survey data hasn’t been made public, the survey as reported reflects a very narrow understanding of social media and how it can be used to promote customer engagement.

The survey report focuses primarily on the use of social media as a communications channel between the brand and the consumer – a cooler but less measurable version of email. Viewed that way, it’s easy to conclude that social media doesn’t offer much as an engagement vehicle. But the potential of social media lies in so much more than its use as yet another top-down channel in which brands say a lot but don’t listen much.

One of the most fundamental recent changes in consumer attitudes and behavior is the decline of the brand as authority figure and the increased consumer preference to be in control – something reflected in the Pitney Bowes survey itself. But another aspect of this paradigm appears to have been ignored: Consumers who formerly relied on the brand as authority now are more inclined to rely on each other.

The online retail space is full of brands that facilitate interactions among consumers, not just between the brand and consumers. Kaboodle is a women’s clothing site that invites consumers to “Shop and share your style with friends.” Users share their style tips and can in turn be followed by other consumers. Kaboodle’s merchants rely on these interactions in making selection and stocking decisions. ModCloth has a similar social shopping model, including a “Be the Buyer” tool that lets users directly affect the merchandise that is carried.

Both of these sites facilitate consumer control, but the social context adds a dimension that arguably makes the relationship stickier. According to one customer: “I love Kaboodle because now I have people from all over the country (who used to be complete strangers) as shopping buddies! This is my new favorite way to shop.” Note, too, that most of the social interactions take place on these companies’ respective sites, not on social media platforms, although the ModCloth page on Facebook has almost 375,000 likes.

The Zavee takeaway:

  • Social can build engagement and loyalty, provided it’s used creatively. It isn’t just another form of email.
  • The genius of social media is that it puts consumers in charge – and lets them learn from and help each other.
  • Social sharing is a paradigm, not a technology. It isn’t limited to Facebook and Twitter and might best be implemented on your own site.

Steve Jobs RIP

by on Thursday, October 6th, 2011

I’ve been the “Mac Guy” in most of my workplaces since at least the mid-90s, but I didn’t start out that way. I actually liked Windows’ command line, because I thought it was cool to be able to diagnose and fix my computer’s (alarmingly frequent) problems.

Then I started using the early Macs in film school and I was completely hooked. It was easy and fun to use as a word processor but what made me a Mac guy for life was an editing workstation called the Avid Media Composer. It was so sophisticated the software wasn’t for sale by itself. It only could be purchased pre-installed – and only on a Mac.

Steve Jobs, 1955-2011, via apple.com

It’s no exaggeration to say that the Avid revolutionized film and video editing, and at the time the Mac was the only widely available platform that could support it. Without the Mac’s intuitive interface and extraordinary graphics support the Avid simply couldn’t have existed as a commercial product.

I was a student, not an experienced editor, when I first encountered the Avid. I couldn’t have added much to a conversation about how to improve it.

But Steve Jobs’ greatest insight was that he didn’t need to spend much time asking users what they wanted. Instead, he observed and listened to users in the real world and drew brilliant, transformative inferences about what users really needed – even if they didn’t know it yet. He recognized that consumers are often motivated to satisfy their short term needs. They have no reason to look over the horizon and imagine tomorrow’s needs or the products that would address them.

But Steve Jobs had every reason to look over the horizon, because that’s where he was most at home. He had his share of setbacks, but in most of what he imagined – easy-to-use interfaces; small, content-oriented devices; even long-form animation – he was more than vindicated.

The Zavee takeaway:

  • Don’t rely on your customers to provide vision for your company or imagination for your products. Listening to your customers is no substitute for listening to yourself.
  • Be true to yourself and your vision. It’s no guarantee of success but you’ll feel better about yourself along the way.
  • Do what you love. Love what you do. Life is short.

Ron Stack of Zavee to Speak on Marketing for Shopping Center Retailers

by on Thursday, July 21st, 2011

I will be speaking tonight on a panel sponsored by the Broward County chapter of the International Council of Shopping Centers (ICSC). The ICSC is the world’s largest shopping center trade organization.

The topic for the evening is “Shopping Center Marketing and Networking Trends” and I will be speaking about how Zavee expands the reach of merchants’ word of mouth marketing, offers effective, affordable, easy-to-use loyalty tools, and provides actionable data about merchants’ customers and their purchasing behavior. More generally, I will be discussing how technology like the Zavee platform and the wide adoption of social media offer local merchants effective and affordable new ways to build their business.

Also on the panel will be several shopping center professionals plus a representative of Living Social. One of the points I intend to make is that Zavee’s social loyalty platform combines the social media tools that have helped Living Social and Groupon grow so quickly with the core loyalty marketing strategy of building long term value creating relationships between merchants and their customers. This gives merchants the best of both worlds: social shopping that builds loyalty as well as traffic.

The seminar is today at 5pm at the Hard Rock in Hollywood. If your business is in a strip center, why not call your landlord and suggest that they attend. What they learn can help them market better – and that can help you.

A Look at the Future of Location-Based Marketing

by on Friday, November 19th, 2010

Bill Hanifin of Loyalty Truth (and a friend of Zavee) was kind enough to point me toward the Location-Based Marketing Summit held recently in New York. Bill thought it would be worth my while and, as usual, he was right.

Although the conference organizers were interested in what comes next for location-based marketing, most of the speakers were oriented toward the here and now. I came away from the conference with a far greater understanding of the uses and limitations of the current technologies and platforms while getting a grasp on some of what lies just over the horizon in the location-based space.

The Wise Marketer, a leading UK-based site for forward-thinking marketers, asked Bill to provide a write-up on the conference. Bill’s report, with which I assisted, was first published in The Wise Marketer for this week and is reprinted below:

The conference blended strategic and tactical insights about location-based marketing techniques, and most of the speakers observed that this branch of mobile marketing is still in its infancy. The principal strategic focus of the conference, however, was on consumer engagement and how to increase it.

Several speakers referred to Forrester’s recent finding that regular use of the ‘check in’ model was still in single-digit percentages, and that consumer awareness of these services wasn’t much higher – a report that has however been disputed at least once.

Either way, with estimates of more than 12 million people playing what consumers will initially consider “the location game”, smartphone penetration reaching 9% of the handset market, and SMS usage covering 95% of all wireless customers, it is clear that almost all consumers can be reached with marketing messages via a mobile handset.

Ian Schafer, CEO for Deep Focus, discussed ways in which marketers could use the technique for more effective marketing, suggesting that it can grow customer loyalty, increase relevance, and provide useful data and insights. He considers the smartphone to be “the next generation loyalty card”, with targeted deals and discounts being available upon check-in (or perhaps even without a digital check-in). By way of example, he highlighted ShopKick, which has a hardware platform that pushes reward currency to the consumer as soon as they enter the merchant’s store (without the consumer even having to check-in or make a purchase).

Android Phone

Android Phone (by Johan Larsson - Creative Commons)

Most of the speakers, including Schafer, took it as read that delivering more relevant marketing messages increases their effectiveness. And, in a highly fragmented communications environment, the relationship between relevance and effectiveness is even more essential.

Overall, it was agreed that location-based applications can at least provide:

  • People – other users who might have something in common with the user;
  • Content – messages or offers based on what the user likes that is at/near her location;
  • Time and Place – targeted, timely messages or offers based on where the user is right now;
  • Context – communications based on prior behaviour, as tracked by the location-based device.

The potential of location-based data is that it can drive better business decisions by adding additional dimensions (i.e. time and place, captured over time in real-time) to what is otherwise known about each consumer’s behaviour. One great example cited was the Microsoft Bing ‘Home Turf Finder’ for the World Cup, which identified certain bars in New York City as “home turf” for fans of a particular team. The determinations were based in part on editorial sources such as Thrillist, but were mostly derived from ‘heat maps’ of consumers who had checked in or tweeted their support as well as their location.

Several speakers also noted Google‘s recent announcement that 30% of mobile searches and 20% of all internet searches have local intent, and said that all of the major players (e.g. Facebook, Google, and even wireless carriers) were already focusing on local information.

There was also considerable discussion of ‘Groupon’, although some panellists expressed doubts that the “deep discount, deal of the day” model provides sustainable customer growth. Speakers agreed, however, that geo-targeting adds value by increasing both relevance and personalisation. And, in order to thrive, it was agreed that location-based applications must provide the consumer with something of value, preferably in terms of relevant and personalised content.

Overall, panellists agreed that there is great demand for marketers to engage with consumers at “the right place and the right time, all the time”. Mobile couponing, despite being a fragmented space, seems to have taken hold. As a result, one area in which technological developments are anticipated is indoor navigation, where GPS signals are sometimes degraded and are not designed to be accurate enough for navigation within a store.

Finally, the issue of consumer privacy arose in almost every session. John Nicholson of law firm Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman concluded that “the more value a marketer delivers, the more information a consumer is likely to share”, and that an application that seems to exist only for marketing purposes is unlikely to gain the consumer’s trust.

(Article copyright 2010 The Wise Marketer)

Big Brands Embrace Social Commerce. Are They Alone?

by on Tuesday, October 12th, 2010

Zavee CEO Alan Pleskow and I attended the inaugural Rise of Social Commerce conference last week in Palo Alto. Big brands (usually) adopt new technologies and strategies earlier than small to medium sized businesses, so the conference provided a fascinating peek at how some of the largest companies are planning for and deploying Social Commerce today.

Social Commerce was defined by the conference organizers as “the use of social technologies to connect, listen, understand, and engage to improve the shopping experience.” For most conference attendees, the goal was removing the the technological, economic and operational obstacles that add “friction” to the online commerce experience.

(via x-ray delta one - Creative Commons)

Does that mean that Social Commerce is only for brands that sell online? And only for enterprise level companies? Not at all. Much of the learning around how consumers interact with brands and each other applies equally to brands whose customers make shopping decisions online but actually buy in-store. And much of the same learning applies equally to SMBs, even if some of their challenges are unique. For example, while SMBs are more likely to ask “How can I find the time?” than “Which department owns this?” using technology to become more customer-centric is something every business can do.

The organizers developed a conceptual framework for Social Commerce that has four phases:

  1. Let’s Be Social
  2. Enlightened Engagement
  3. Store of the Community
  4. Frictionless Commerce

The first phase is where many SMBs are today: working out the basics of consumer engagement on social platforms. Very few business we meet through Zavee still believe that social media is irrelevant to their business. Their most common issues are the time commitment required and the loss of control over their business’ message. Depending on the size of the business the time issue can be a real concern, but small businesses can start small, and increase their investment in social media as they begin to see results. As for the control issue, a few minutes on Twitter should open the eyes of any business owner about how much control they really have.

The second phase should be the destination for most SMBs, and they should get there as quickly as possible. This phase involves adding social content to the shopping experience: reviews from consumers, information and suggestions from the business, even content sourced from third parties. Regardless of whether the actual transaction takes place in the online or offline domain, enriching the consumer’s shopping experience through social content can have a significant impact on businesses of any size. Consumers respond to timely, relevant, personalized content by trying new businesses, becoming loyal customers and sharing their experiences with the community.

The third and fourth phases are over the horizon for many enterprises, let alone SMBs. The third phase involves bringing consumers into the process by which businesses create, buy, stock and price products, and the fourth involves completely re-imagining the retail experience. Some of the examples from the conference, such as Kaboodle and ModCloth, are very impressive. Many of the companies at the conference are looking to leverage Facebook’s enhanced commerce capabilities to bring the online store to the consumer rather than force the consumer to leave Facebook for an e-commerce site. SMBs may not be able to do everything these companies have done, but the underlying insight – that consumers respond to being included in decisions that are made upstream of the purchase – is something SMBs should consider making part of their strategy.

With so much emphasis on the enterprise, why did Alan and I attend this conference? It’s because we believe that the definition quoted above also describes what Zavee does for our merchants and shoppers. Our platform helps merchants use social media to listen, understand and engage with consumers. More importantly, Zavee is a community that supports the shopper-to-shopper and merchant-to-shopper interactions that lead to an enhanced shopping experience and a stronger brand. Adopting a Social Commerce strategy can seem daunting for SMBs, but with Zavee they don’t have to do it alone.

The Zavee takeaway:

  • SMBs can learn a lot from what enterprises think and do, even if these learnings can’t be applied directly.
  • The insight that consumers respond favorably to content that is timely, relevant, personalized can be leveraged by businesses of any size.
  • SMBs need to get into the Social Commerce space, but Zavee can ensure that they don’t take the journey alone.

4 Things I Just Learned About Location-Based Marketing

by on Tuesday, October 5th, 2010

As someone who enjoys – but doesn’t completely get – Foursquare and other “check-in” services on the Web, I was looking forward to the Location-Based Marketing Summit I attended last week in New York. I learned a great deal about this rapidly-growing field, and I had the chance to hear and speak with some of the people who are responsible for the latest thinking and most interesting developments in location-based services (LBS) and their application to marketing. Here are some of the things I learned at the conference:

via jorgempf (Creative Commons)

Check-in is only the beginning. Services such as Foursquare and Gowalla have received so much publicity lately that it’s easy to equate LBS with check-in. But LBS also includes maps and other query-based services (imagine wandering through a museum and using your mobile device to learn about the painting you’re standing in front of) and a variety of shopping platforms (mostly deals and discounts but also several loyalty platforms) as well as socially oriented services like Foursquare. What can LBS do for marketers? At least three things:

  • Grow loyalty. Some marketers, such as Tasti-D-Lite, are using LBS as a loyalty platform, where a purchase results in an automatic “check in” and a message to friends as well as an award of loyalty points. A new service called TopGuest drives enrollment in hotel loyalty programs by offering bonus points when a guest checks in (in the LBS sense).
  • Increase relevance. Adding time and place to any information increases its relevance. And almost any kind of information can be made more valuable by adding relevance. Location data can tell marketers about what people like to do and to buy, and when and where they like to do it. It can place consumer behavior in context: Is going to Starbucks after the gym the same as going there on the way to work? Is going to Starbucks because it’s convenient the same as going there because you like it? With more detailed and relevant information about the consumer, marketers can create messages and offers that are much more relevant to the consumer – and more likely to be acted on.
  • Provide data. Marketers also can use aggregated location data to make better decisions. Comcast, which uses Twitter as a customer service channel, has been mapping tweets as a way to learn where service resources are needed most and communicate with customers in those areas. Location data can also be used to map patterns of customer behavior, from which bars attract fans of what teams to which doctors are prescribing what medications.

Engagement is everything. The hype about check-in services has obscured the wide variety of location-based services that are already available. The common denominator among them is engagement. How can LBS create engagement? One way is to deliver relevant information delivered in real time. Or, as one speaker called it, earning attention by being in “the right place, right time, all the time.” Another source of engagement is providing an enjoyable experience, such as by including game mechanics. On a superficial level this is how the check-in services work. But the real value of these services is relevance: for avid users, where their friends are and what they are doing right now matters. Another way to create engagement is financial: location-based shopping services that provide deals and discounts certainly have an audience.

Local is next. It’s easy to think of LBS as the province of large marketers, and it’s true that large marketers are better able than small ones to take the risk of jumping into LBS early. However, many of the speakers (and attendees) at the conference were talking about local applications. Why? One reason may be that, according to Google, one-third of mobile searches and 20% of all searches have local intent. That’s a big audience to overlook, and with the cost of technology decreasing, local marketers have a chance to engage with them using a location-based platform. Although local use of LBS is still in its early stages – for one thing, awareness of and interest in LBS is thought to be low among local marketers – look for substantial growth in this sector. And look for Zavee to be right in the middle of things.

Privacy is a transaction. This was one of the most eye-opening insights of the entire conference. No speaker disagreed that consumer privacy concerns were a legitimate issue for LBS and the marketers who use them. Several speakers, for example, were critical of Facebook for being insufficiently sensitive to users’ privacy concerns. But every speaker who discussed privacy at any length made the same point: While a service that exists only to push marketing messages will always have a privacy problem with consumers, a service that delivers a genuine benefit will find consumers more likely to share private information. The greater the benefit, the greater the sharing. This only works, of course, if consumers know what they are being asked to share – a potential issue with some advertising programs. All of the speakers at this conference, however, emphasized the need for LBS to be transparently opt-in with an easy way to opt back out. It will be very interesting to see, over the next several years, whether this transactional notion of privacy reflects consumer behavior or whether there are certain bright lines that no LBS can safely cross.

This has been a busy few weeks but our conference-going isn’t over: Zavee CEO Alan Pleskow and I are off to California for the Rise of Social Commerce Conference in Palo Alto – expect a post about it next week.

A New Aviation-Internet Creation

by on Tuesday, August 10th, 2010

Remember Captain Chesley “Sully” Sullenberger? He’s the US Airways pilot who landed a fully loaded jet in the Hudson River in January 2009 with only minor injuries to the 155 people on board. His skill and heroism brought him well-deserved fame, but the quick actions of smartphone-enabled witnesses brought his actions to light nearly in real time, as they posted photos to Twitter almost before the plane stopped moving. This event didn’t just catapult Capt. Sullenberger into the public eye. It also changed the perception of Twitter from a forum for narcissistic ramblings to a mainstream social media tool.

Emergency Slide (via NASA)

Now the airlines have given us another social media star, Steven Slater. Mr. Slater is the JetBlue flight attendant who got into an altercation with a passenger as his flight approached the gate at JFK, then grabbed his bags, grabbed a beer and fled down the plane’s emergency chute. In addition to extensive coverage by local media in New York, Mr. Slater’s own Facebook page has more than 25,000 friends and growing at the rate of several thousand friends per hour. Other Facebook users have started their own pages about the incident, including one called “Free Steven Slater”. On Twitter, the event is reported to be the number one trending topic in New York and several other cities

Will Mr. Slater’s instant celebrity, which is owed in no small part to social media, make him, as some suggest, “an online folk hero”? That depends, I think, on whether Mr. Slater’s actions tap into something authentic about how we feel about employers, airlines or both. The urge to tell your boss to “take this job and shove it” is timeless, but people rarely act on the sentiment. (Although this resignation by storyboard is pretty classic). The combination of tighter security, increased baggage fees and, perhaps, fuller planes has led to either customer service failures on the part of the airlines or more abuse from passengers, depending on who is asked.


Perhaps, then, it is timely to remind businesses of every size how valuable social media can be as a customer service channel. With all the buzz that this event has created, there is no good reason for JetBlue, no stranger to social media, to have stayed largely quiet about it. Whether to reassure passengers about their safety (and the airline’s hiring standards) or even to laugh it off, JetBlue should be much more engaged with its customers.


The Zavee takeaway:

  • Of course he shouldn’t have done it, but the getaway slide is pretty impressive.
  • JetBlue is doing no favors to itself or its customers by yielding the social media (and conventional media) environment so completely to Mr. Slater.
  • There is a difference between being a folk hero and a real one, even online, and most people know which is which.

Update (8/11/10): TechCrunch confirms that the “resignation by dry erase board” is a hoax.

ADT Saved My House

by on Friday, July 23rd, 2010

Those of you who follow Zavee Thinking may have noticed that this week’s post is a few days late. I was a little tied up this week and when I explain why I hope you will understand that the delay couldn’t be helped.

I was planning to blog about the new Old Spice campaign, in which Wieden + Kennedy’s creative team first seeded Social Media influentials with the idea of tweeting Old Spice pitch-hunk Isaiah Mustafa to ask for a personalized video – and then produced the video “responses” almost in real time. You can read about this amazing campaign here.

But I’m not going to blog about Old Spice. I’m going to blog about my fire, and about how ADT (and others) saved my house.

At 10:06 on Monday morning, ADT, which provides central station monitoring services, detected a fire alarm on the second floor of my home in New Jersey. They called the local fire department, which responded within minutes. Soon, firefighters from no less than 10 different companies – mostly volunteers – were working to put out the fire, which began when wires shorted inside a wall between a bathroom and a closet. No one was home when the fire broke out and none of the firefighters or police was injured.

Because ADT called in the alarm so quickly, the fire damage was confined to a relatively small space. The fire chief told my wife, however, that if we hadn’t had central station monitoring the house would likely have burned to the ground. Since my neighbors were either at work or on vacation it isn’t likely that anyone would have called 911 before it was too late.

As soon as the firefighters finished, we called our insurance company, Chubb. They dispatched a demolition and restoration crew immediately and by that afternoon a dozen people were working to clean and dry out the house. The amount of smoke and water damage is surprising for such a small fire, but while heat goes up, water goes down and smoke and soot go everywhere – especially on a hot day when the air conditioning is blowing. In fact, much of the damage isn’t even close to the site of the fire.

I’m blogging about my fire first, because I want to thank the firefighters and police who burst into a smoke-filled house on a hot July day not knowing what they would find and who used sensitivity as well as skill in fighting the blaze. They could have torn my house apart while trying to save it. Instead they put tarps over the furniture so it wouldn’t be damaged by water and falling debris. Our local firefighters are volunteers and they are at the top of the list of local causes my family and I support.

Second, I want to emphasize the value of central station monitoring. We use ADT and we credit them with saving our house, but any good central station company will do. We were pretty cavalier about our service because we looked at it mainly as a burglar alarm and the house is rarely vacant. And house fires happen to other people. At least we had fresh batteries in the heat detectors. We had changed ours recently and if the fire had happened only a couple of months ago it could have been much worse.

Finally, I think everyone should take a hard look at their fire and casualty insurance policies and make sure that (a) they are adequately covered and (b) their insurance company is willing and able to handle the kind of losses that a house fire can cause. One thing we learned from our fire is that different insurance companies have different perspectives on losses like ours. The Chubb adjuster and everyone else on the team assures us that they have seen far worse than ours. Their overriding message is one that we needed to hear: Don’t worry. Knowing that we aren’t going to have to fight over every penny provides enormous relief at a time of great stress. If you don’t get the same feeling from your insurance company, you need a new one. And if it costs a little more to be confident that you won’t have a battle on your hands if you make a claim, it’s probably worth it.

The Zavee takeaway:

  • Central station monitoring can save your house – and perhaps your life.
  • Fire insurance isn’t a commodity – get the coverage and service you need and deserve.
  • Firefighters are amazing – they deserve everyone’s respect and support. They certainly have mine.